Let me make one prediction which I will make time and again -- the test scores will rise dramatically through NY State Ed manipulation of cut scores to make it look like things are beginning to work. That is the reason getting results takes till summer -- they have to figure out what scores they want for maximum political impact.
| Brooklyn Teachers Saw the Common Core Tests, and They Say NO!by dianeravitch | 
Parents  are not allowed to see the Common Core tests. Teachers do see them.  Here is what the teachers at PS 29 in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn, say about  the tests.
Dear Diane,
WOOHOO!  Don't you feel we've reached a turning point? It is amazing to see all  of the incredible acts of resistance bubbling up all over the country! 
Thank you,
Michelle Kupper
CEC 15 member
Parent, PS 29 Brooklyn
CEC 15 member
Parent, PS 29 Brooklyn
----
At  PS 29 in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn, teachers could not wait any longer to  speak their minds about the tests. For too long, they had felt the  curriculum growing more restricted, the pressure mounting to get their  students to perform, and an increasing dissatisfaction with the  profession they so love. A group of six progressive teachers wrote a  strong position paper on testing with the intention of moving the  conversation along in the neighborhood and forging a path of resistance  against the testing machine. 
Last  year, a forum was held at the school about high-stakes testing.  Teachers voiced their concerns about the high-stakes nature and growing  prominence of the exams. This year, a group of like-minded teachers and  parents came together to form an Education Action Committee. The  teachers on this committee drafted the resolution and presented it to  the staff as test prep was getting underway. They had the resolution  ready to go before the tests began. Out of respect for the community and  the families helping to ready their children for these stressful exams,  however, they decided to delay its release until after the exams were  over. It became clear - with the ELA’s incredibly developmentally  inappropriate content and ambiguously worded questions – that they could  wait no longer to go public with their sentiments.
They  advocate for parents to join the movement against high-stakes tests;  they advocate that parents raise their voices and take meaningful  actions such as contacting legislators and making informed decisions for  their children about the tests; and they advocate for parents to gain a  better sense of teachers’ sentiments about high-stakes tests and make  public the conversations about tests that have been happening in private  for years.
The  full resolution is below. Thank you to the growing throngs of parents,  students, and educators all over the country raising their voices  TOGETHER!
PS 29 Teachers Resolution
April 4, 2014
Over  the past decade, standardized tests have taken on greater importance in  New York’s public schools. New York City’s students now take state ELA  and math exams in grades 3 through 8, and their performance on these  tests is linked to promotion, middle- and high-school admissions,  teacher evaluations and school progress reports.
Because  the tests are now aligned with the Common Core State Standards, they  have become more difficult, resulting in much lower passing rates across  New York City and State. The tests have also become longer: elementary  school students will spend between seven and nine hours taking the state  tests this month and next, and students with testing accommodations may  have to sit for as many as eighteen hours of testing this spring.  Moreover, during March and April, students in testing-grade classrooms  can spend up to three hours per day preparing for the state tests.
As  teachers, we feel the impact of these changes in our classrooms. In  testing grades, the anxiety that students and teachers have about the  state exams is palpable. Some students break down in tears during  testing and related test-prep sessions, knowing that their performance  impacts not only their promotion to the next grade, but also their  chances of getting into choice middle and high schools.
Compounding  the emotional turmoil, teachers in testing grades must narrow their  otherwise rich curricula in order to make room for test prep. Subjects  like social studies, word study and read aloud are cast aside, and  valuable social-emotional learning and exploration must be limited in  order to make sure that students are ready for the exams come spring.
High-stakes  tests require that teachers narrow not only their curricula but also  the skills they emphasize. As teachers in testing grades prepare  students for the state exams, they must often put aside their emphasis  on skills like elaboration and creative thinking in order to teach kids  to write formulaic responses and find the one right answer.
Even  the lower grades have been affected by these high-stakes tests. The  pressure to prepare students for their upcoming years of testing has cut  time for exploration and play. Additionally, that pressure has  increased the need for students to meet, at times, developmentally  inappropriate milestones in reading and writing.
Beyond  the scope of individual classrooms, high-stakes tests have significant  consequences for a school as a whole. As teachers are pulled from their  programs to accommodate the proctoring and scoring of exams, a number of  critical support services, ESL periods, ICT classrooms and specialty  programs are disrupted for nearly a month.
When  used correctly, we believe that assessment is a powerful tool. At PS  29, we constantly assess our students, collecting meaningful data that  informs our day-to-day instruction. Unlike the high-stakes tests, our  assessments improve the education we provide.
Across  grades, we feel with great certainty that the rise of standardized  testing—and most specifically, its high-stakes nature—has eroded real  student learning time, narrowed the curriculum and jeopardized the rich,  meaningful education our students need and deserve.
As  such, we, the undersigned, believe that it is crucial for teachers to  raise our voices on these issues, and we resolve to stand together to  advocate for the elimination of the high-stakes nature of standardized  tests.
Sincerely,
Kim Van Duzer
Leah Brunski
Rachel Knight
Peter Cipparone
Sara Thorne
Susannah Sperry
Liz Sturges Cosentino
Carolyn Rivas
Sophia Soto
Kristen Adamczyk
Sarah McCaffrey
Mollie Lief
Chantelle Luk
Melissa Bandes Golden
Frank Thomas
Jackie Lichter
Tristram Carver
Jessica Albizu
Hana Pardon
Lisa Cohen
Dan Turret
Lauren McGivney
Adam Gerloff
Bradley Frome
Izzi Kane
Molly Dubow
Kathy Nobles
January Mark
Jasmine Junsay
Nadira Udairam
Aaron Berns
Monica Salazar-Austin
Rachel Certner
Alice Pack
Marisa Noiseux
Leah Brunski
Rachel Knight
Peter Cipparone
Sara Thorne
Susannah Sperry
Liz Sturges Cosentino
Carolyn Rivas
Sophia Soto
Kristen Adamczyk
Sarah McCaffrey
Mollie Lief
Chantelle Luk
Melissa Bandes Golden
Frank Thomas
Jackie Lichter
Tristram Carver
Jessica Albizu
Hana Pardon
Lisa Cohen
Dan Turret
Lauren McGivney
Adam Gerloff
Bradley Frome
Izzi Kane
Molly Dubow
Kathy Nobles
January Mark
Jasmine Junsay
Nadira Udairam
Aaron Berns
Monica Salazar-Austin
Rachel Certner
Alice Pack
Marisa Noiseux
 
0 comments:
Post a Comment